Abstract
A decade of voluntary commitments, transparency reports, and self-regulatory frameworks has failed to meaningfully constrain the market power of large digital platforms. This essay traces the political economy of platform governance, arguing that structural conflicts of interest make genuine self-regulation impossible. Drawing on the EU Digital Markets Act and the UK Online Safety Act, we outline a model of democratic platform oversight grounded in participatory accountability mechanisms and mandatory interoperability requirements.
Keywordsplatform governance·digital regulation·DMA·self-regulation·competition policy
AreasPublic Policy·Technology & Artificial Intelligence·Sociology & Society
Download
Download PDF
PDF · 14 pages
DOI
10.0000/hr.P5GOV
Digital Object Identifier
Cite This Work
Whitfield, Thomas. “Governing the Governors: Why Platform Self-Regulation Has Failed and What Democratic Oversight Requires.” The Hinksey Review, vol. 1, no. 2, 2024 doi:10.0000/hr.P5GOV.
Additional Publications
Green Transition Financing in Emerging Economies: Sovereign Wealth, Industrial Policy, and the Race to Net Zero
Aiko Tanaka, Rafael Monteiro, Fatima Al-Rashid · Mar 2025
Predictive Inequity: How Risk-Scoring Algorithms Perpetuate Socioeconomic Disparities in Public Health Resource Allocation
Chiara Bianchi, Nour El-Amin · Feb 2025
Central Bank Independence Under Fiscal Dominance: Lessons from the Post-Pandemic Period
James Hartley · Jan 2025