Abstract
As NHS trusts pilot AI triage systems to manage post-pandemic waiting lists, fundamental questions arise about accountability, bias, and the erosion of clinical judgement. This essay examines three competing ethical frameworks—utilitarian efficiency, Rawlsian fairness, and virtue ethics—and argues that current deployment practices inadequately address the duty of care owed to patients from marginalised communities. We propose a governance model centred on interpretable AI and mandatory human override mechanisms.
KeywordsAI ethics·medical triage·NHS·algorithmic bias·healthcare AI·duty of care
AreasTechnology & Artificial Intelligence·Public Policy·Social Impact
Download
Download PDF
PDF · 14 pages
DOI
10.52847/hinksey.v1i1.004
Digital Object Identifier
Cite This Work
Okafor, Samuel. “Algorithmic Triage and the Duty of Care: Ethical Frameworks for AI-Assisted Medical Prioritisation.” The Hinksey Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 2024 doi:10.52847/hinksey.v1i1.004.
Additional Publications
Green Transition Financing in Emerging Economies: Sovereign Wealth, Industrial Policy, and the Race to Net Zero
Aiko Tanaka, Rafael Monteiro, Fatima Al-Rashid · Mar 2025
Predictive Inequity: How Risk-Scoring Algorithms Perpetuate Socioeconomic Disparities in Public Health Resource Allocation
Chiara Bianchi, Nour El-Amin · Feb 2025
Central Bank Independence Under Fiscal Dominance: Lessons from the Post-Pandemic Period
James Hartley · Jan 2025